Monthly Atmospheric CO2 Mixing Ratios from the NOAA CMDL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling Network, 1968-2002
Investigators
Pieter P. Tans and Thomas J. Conway
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, U.S.A.
Period of Record
1968-2002
Measurement Sites
Algeria
Assekrem
American Samoa
Tutuila
Antarctica
Halley Station, Antarctica, U.K.
Palmer Station, Antarctica, U.S.A.
South Pole, Antarctica, U.S.A.
Syowa Station, Antarctica
Argentina
Tierra Del Fuego, La Redonda Isla
Australia
Cape Grim, Tasmania
Barbados
Ragged Point
Canada
Alert, Nunavut, Canada
Mould Bay, Nunavut, Canada
Chile
Easter Island
China, People's Republic of
Mt. Waliguan
France
Amsterdam Island
Crozet Island
Greenland
Summit
Guam
Mariana Islands
Hungary
Hegyhatsal
Iceland
Storhofdi, Vestmannaeyjar
Ireland
Mace Head, County Galway
Israel
Sede Boker, Negev Desert
Kazakhstan
Plateau Assy
Sary Taukum
Kiribati, Republic of
Christmas Island
Korea, Republic of
Tae-ahn Peninsula
Malta
Dwejra Point, Gozo
Mongolia
Ulaan Uul
Namibia
Gobabeb
Norway
Ny-Alesund, Svalbard (Norway and Sweden)
Ocean Station M
Poland
Baltic Sea
Portugal
Terceira Island, Azores
Romania
Black Sea, Constanta
Seychelles
Mahe Island
Spain
Tenerife, Canary Islands
United Kingdom
Ascension Island, U.K.
St. Davids Head, Bermuda, U.K.
Tudo Hill, Bermuda, U.K.
United States
Barrow, Alaska, U.S.A.
Cape Kumukahi, Hawaii, U.S.A.
Cape Meares, Oregon, U.S.A.
Cold Bay, Alaska, U.S.A.
Grifton, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Key Biscayne, Florida, U.S.A.
Mauna Loa, Hawaii, U.S.A.
Niwot Ridge, Colorado, U.S.A.
Park Falls, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Point Arena, California, U.S.A.
Ocean Station C, U.S.A.
Sand Island, Midway, U.S.A.
Shemya Island, Alaska, U.S.A.
St. Croix, Virgin Islands, U.S.A.
Wendover, Utah, U.S.A.
Methods
Starting in 1968, air samples were collected in cylindrical glass flasks tapered at both ends to ground glass stopcocks lubricated with hydrocarbon grease. At several sites from 1980 to 1985 samples were also collected in spherical 5-L flasks equipped with a single ground glass stopcock. These flasks were filled by the evacuation method described below. In 1983, measurements of CH4 in the flask samples were begun. Experiments at this time revealed that CO mixing ratios increased with time in the greased flasks. In 1989, 0.5-L glass flasks equipped with glass piston Teflon O-ring stopcocks were introduced into the network so CO could be measured in addition to CO2 and CH4. In 1990, measurements of 13C/12C and 18O/16O of CO2 in the flask samples were begun. The precision of the isotopic measurements was better with larger volume flasks, so in 1991 2.5-L glass flasks with two Teflon O-ring stopcocks began to replace the 0.5-L flasks. In 1994, the conversion of the network to 2.5-L flasks was completed. Samples continue to be collected in 2.5-L flasks.
Flask samples are always collected in pairs, once or twice per week, on a schedule determined largely by the sample collector. The sample collectors have been given guidelines concerning preferred wind speeds, directions, and time of day for sample collection. Samples are dried during analysis using a cryogenic trap at -70°C.
From 1968 to 1980, collectors used a hand-held aspirator bulb to pull air through the flasks. In 1980, a portable battery powered pumping unit was introduced. This method allowed the sample collector to move downwind while the flasks, connected in series, were being flushed, enabled pressurization of the flasks, and incorporated an intake line that could be extended to 2 m above the ground. This device resulted in improved agreement between members of flask pairs and decreased scatter in the measurements. To avoid artifacts due to this inhomogeneity in the data quality, most CMDL analyses of the flask data begin with the 1981 data. The sampling method changed again in mid-1990 when an improved portable sampler was introduced. While the sampling principles were unchanged, the new sampler employed a single, larger battery; a more rugged, higher capacity pump; a 5-m intake line; and a back pressure regulator to control the pressure in the flasks. The effect of the flask and sampler improvements was an increase in the percentage of sample pairs meeting a CO2 agreement criterion of 0.5 ppm, from ~75% in the mid-1980s to ~90% in 1992. However, overlapped sampling was conducted at several sites and no offsets due to the new flasks or sampling equipment were observed. In 1994 a new automated sampler with a thermoelectrically-cooled condenser was introduced. The condenser, chilled to ~5ºC, removes some of the water vapor at humid tropical locations. This was sufficient to eliminate the contamination of the 18O/16O ratio in CO2 caused by isotopic exchange with water vapor. Both the automated and manual samplers continue to be used in the network.
At Barrow, Niwot Ridge, Mauna Loa, Cape Kumukahi, Christmas Island, and Samoa, flask samples have also been collected in evacuated 3-L flasks. This type of flask was also used on the container ships making regular voyages in the Pacific Ocean between Los Angeles and New Zealand until 2000. In this method two flasks are filled in rapid succession by holding the flask into the wind, purging the dead volume in the inlet to the flask, opening the stopcock, and allowing the flask to fill with air to ambient atmospheric pressure. In overlapped sampling at Mauna Loa and Niwot Ridge, no significant difference was found between the 3-L flasks and the pressurized flasks. At Barrow and Cape Kumukahi, there is an indication of an offset of ~0.3 ppm, with the evacuated flasks generally being higher. Since sampling on commercial vessels resumed in 2002, samples are being collected using an automated sampler installed on the bridge with air intakes installed above the bridge as far forward and outboard as possible.
From 1968 until 1980, flask samples were measured by transferring the air from the flasks to a nondispersive infrared analyzer (NDIR) manually by means of a mercury displacement pump (Komhyr et al. 1983). In 1980, this apparatus was replaced by a semiautomatic analysis apparatus described by Komhyr et al. (1983). In 1988, this system was replaced by a more highly automated system that was capable of higher precision CO2 measurements and able to handle up to three times as many flasks per analysis day. Starting in 1997, samples have been measured for CO2 on a new automated apparatus that allows measurements of CH4, CO, H2, N2O, and SF6 by gas chromatography to be made on each sample during one analytical process (Tans et al., 1998). All the CMDL CO2 measurements are reported in the WMO X85 mole fraction scale. The CMDL measurements are made using standard gases traceable to the WMO Central CO2 Laboratory formerly operated by C.D. Keeling at Scripps Institution of Oceanography and now located at CMDL (Thoning et al. 1987; Zhao et al., 1997). From 1968 to 1980, the working standard gases consisted of CO2 in N2. From 1980 to 1990, the secondary standards were CO2 in natural air and the tertiary and working gases were CO2 in synthetic air (N2, O2, and Ar) (Komhyr et al. 1985). Since 1990, only CO2 in natural air standards have been used.
The data selection methods used to obtain the values from which monthly and annual means are calculated have been discussed in detail by Komhyr et al. (1985), Conway et al. (1988), and Conway et al. (1994), so only a brief description will be given here. First, both members of sample pairs are flagged when the CO2 difference between them is greater than 0.5 ppm. Prior to 1989, one value of a bad pair was sometimes retained, based on the results of the curve-fitting procedure described below. Since 1989, both members of bad pairs are automatically rejected. Samples that are affected by improper sampling techniques, or analytical problems are also flagged as rejected data. At this point a curve is fit to the remaining data, and values lying more than ±3 residual standard deviations from the curve are flagged as not representing well mixed, regionally representative air masses. The curve-fitting procedure is repeated until no more samples are flagged. The fitted curves are then used to calculate monthly and annual means. Most analyses of the NOAA/CMDL flask CO2 data use only the retained data, but the samples flagged as not representative of background conditions may still contain useful information.
References
- Conway, T.J., P. Tans, L.S. Waterman, K.W. Thoning, K.A. Masarie, and R.H. Gammon. 1988. Atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements in the remote global troposphere, 1981-1984. Tellus, 40B:81-115.
- Conway, T.J., P.P. Tans, L.S. Waterman, K.W. Thoning, D.R. Kitzis, K.A. Masarie, and N. Zhang. 1994. Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the NOAA/CMDL global air sampling network. J. of Geophys. Res., 99:22831-22855.
- Komhyr, W.D., L.S. Waterman, and W.R. Taylor. 1983. Semiautomatic nondispersive infrared analyzer apparatus for CO2 air sample analyses, J. of Geophys. Res., 88:1315-1322.
- Komhyr, W.D., R.H. Gammon, T.B. Harris, L.S. Waterman, T.J. Conway, W.R. Taylor, and K.W. Thoning. 1985. Global atmospheric CO2 distributions and variations from 1968-82 NOAA/GMCC CO2 flask sample data. J. of Geophys. Res., 90:5567-5596.
- Tans, P.P. (ed.) et al. 1998. Carbon Cycle, Chapter 2 in Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory No. 24 Summary Report 1996-1997, edited by D.J. Hoffmann et al., pp. 30-51, NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories, Boulder CO.
- Thoning, K.W., P. Tans, T.J. Conway, and L.S. Waterman. 1987. NOAA/GMCC calibrations of CO2-in-air reference gases: 1979-1985. NOAA Tech. Memo. (ERL ARL-150). Environmental Research Laboratories, Boulder, CO, 63 pp.
- Zhao, C.L., P.P. Tans and K.W. Thoning. 1997. A high precision manometric system for absolute calibrations of CO2 in dry air. J. Geophys. Res. 102 (D5) 5885-5894.
CITE AS: Tans, Pieter P. and T.J. Conway, 2005. Monthly Atmospheric CO2 Mixing Ratios from the NOAA CMDL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling Network, 1968-2002. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.